Last Week: 1-2
Don’t get me started on Idaho AND LA Tech both snatching defeat from the jaws of victory ATS. I mean Idaho not only ended up not staying close they completely fell apart when they got within 6 points. Maybe there is a reason that Idaho is historically one of the worst teams EVER in college football. But it’s OK – I have no business betting on West Coast teams (and LA Tech twice.)
Game 1
Ohio -6.5
@
Ball State + 6.5
Again it seems the betting public has lost sight of how bad Ball State is. I’ll give them this, they are riding high after beating a 0 win EMU team by 2 points. Any time you beat Eastern Michigan you know you’ve done something…what that something is I’m not sure, but I know it’s something. They have 1 friggin win…and it’s against EMU! And you’re telling me that there is someone that thinks 6.5 points for Ball State is enough? No.
As for Ohio they have 3 wins. I would stop now, but I can’t. They only real “blemish” or bad loss on their record is to Kent State…at home. So I can kind of understand this line – and understand that there may be some concern about that loss – but I’m here to tell you Frank Solich will not let his team have 2 terrible games in a row. The guy is actually a good coach, the idiots who fired him at Nebraska are still paying for it. Take Ohio and thank Frank Solich.
Game 2:
Akron + 12
@
NIU – 12
Let me start this by saying that I may be falling into a trap here. I think Akron is just awful and no amount of points would ever make me bet on them, but is NIU giving up 12 points really a good line? NIU, under Jerry Kill, is TERRIBLE against the spread when they are favored by more than 14 points! Lucky for us it’s only 12 right? NIU is starting their backup QB in DeMarcus Grady for a second straight week. He can’t pass, but he can run. That should be enough to beat Akron.
Akron isn’t awful. I would never bet on Akron unless it’s against EMU, Miami OH or Ball State. That said they have a very deceptive 0-5 record…well not really. I can’t find anything nice to really say about them, Akron is only 1-4 ATS, that’s terrible. The only fear I have is that NIU continues to come out and play flat like they did a week ago vs. Miami OH. I don’t see that being an issue here however as the game is at home and on Halloween!
Take NIU…it’s going to be a weird game but they’ll pull it off.
Game 3:
Missouri -4
@
Colorado
Let me say this Gabbert is an amazing QB at Missouri, miles ahead of where Toledo QB Tim Opelt is on the talent scale. Tim Opelt made the Colorado secondary look like little kids, not just little kids, but like that one South Park episode where the Detriot Redwings put a hurting on Stan’s pee wee hockey squad. Sure the kids, like Colorado, had something to play for but in the end they just couldn’t do it.

The Colorado Secondary will once again be in tears...
Colorado, what can I say nice about them…ummmmmm…well they have neat helmets. Ummm…they also beat Wyoming who isn’t THAT bad. Colorado has a win vs. Kansas as well. Again – neither of those teams put the Gabbert on you. Gabbert will hit you right in the mustache from 50 yards away with a bullet pass if he wanted to. You can’t bet against that.
Take Mizzou, give Colorado all the points they want.
BONUS PICK: WMU (-4) Over Kent State (+4)
Tags: 2009, Akron, Ball State, Bets, Betting, Colorado, EMU, FOOTBALL, Gabbert, kent State, Lines, Missouri, MONEY Line, NCAA, NIU, Ohio, PICKS, Spreads, Stanley's Cup, Week 9, WMU
Posted in Week 9 | Comments (0)
Last week I went 1-2…and you know what REALLY pisses me off about last week? I should have at least been 2-1. OK LA Tech got smoked and probably couldn’t win in a million tries, HOWEVER, Coach Wanny and the Panthers SHOULD have scored from the 1 inch line…but had to settle for a FG. I hate Wanny, and the Panthers ALMOST as much as I hate watching a Gummi Bear sing and dance:
Gummy Bear
Let’s move on to this week’s picks:
Game 1
Bowling Green -3
@
Ball State + 3
I think if there is one thing we can say about the betting public it’s that they don’t really care too much about MAC games – this is where some advantages can be found. Those who don’t really know too much about Ball State probably remember last years team that almost went undefeated…by losing 2 games. Can they really be that bad just a few months removed from being beat down in a bowl game?
Yes. They are probably the worst team in the MAC, and that’s saying a lot considering Eastern Michigan is in that conference. The fact is that they played a few “good” teams close. What do I mean by “good” teams? I mean Toledo and Temple. And if you’re like me you’re probably thinking those teams aren’t good. You’d be right. However compared to Ball State it should have been like the Dallas Cowboys playing the Kansas City Chiefs…er….never mind.
The point is you can’t think Ball State is a good team because they played teams that should have pounded them fairly close. Those teams that should have pounded them are bad too! Just because they are less bad doesn’t mean that some of the tendencies that qualify them as bad won’t show up during the game – for example the fact Toledo doesn’t send any players out there on D. They figure the longer their D is out there the less time their O has to catch up. Take Bowling Green, because Ball State is very, very bad.
Game 2
CMU -7
@
WMU + 7
Let’s stick with the MAC theme this week, I kind of like it. Here is my theory on this game WMU is getting a slight boost in the line due to the fact they beat down Toledo last week. However if you read my pick before this you would know that I happen to think that Toledo is a terrible team.
So is WMU as good as they seem to be vs. Toledo? No. Are they as bad as they appeared to be vs. NIU? No. The fact is that Toledo’s defense has a way of making everyone look good the same way that NIU’s defense has a way of making you look bad. The fact is the WMU is probably the 3rd best team in the MAC West and CMU is the #1 team in the MAC West. If we just looked at that we would know that CMU will probably win this game.
The thing that you have to keep in mind here is that while CMU is on the road it should not have any affect on the spread. CMU does not have many issues when they travel IN STATE for games this season (Michigan State can tell you.) CMU is a very good football team that probably won’ t be challenged much during their MAC schedule, this game is a great chance for them to feel the need to get fired up and put a hurting on a squad. WMU will try to put up a good fight but…won’t. Take CMU, be happy.
Game 3
Northern Illinois University -7
@
Toledo + 7
OK, game 3 and we are staying MAC. NIU is the #2 team in the MAC west in my opinion, and Toledo isn’t very good. That was my baseline for this pick, then I stared to do some research.
NIU runs their offense out of a spread formation, however unlike 99% of the spread teams out there they spread you out to run the ball. They have a play maker in QB Chandler Harnish and one of the best unknown backs in the country in Chad Spann (who is #2 in the nation in TDs and #2 on the NIU depth chart.) Any time you can have the #2 TD scoring running back in the country as your back up your probably have some pretty good depth at that spot. A 2 headed monster is never a bad thing when you talk about a running game in the midwest. These October/November games are going to start getting cold and running the ball is a great way to not have to worry about wind/rain/snow/cold.
The weather in Toledo tomorrow should be some early rain showers followed by 40 degree HEAT by kickoff. If there was ever a time to have a running team this would be it.
Toledo is not with out it’s charm. They are a high power offense that can score on just about every play – however their starting QB will probably end up being freshman Austin Dantin – who played great vs. WMU after starting QB Alex Opelt went down with an injury. The only problem? Well Austin lit the skies ablaze AFTER WMU took a commanding lead and didn’t seem interested in the game anymore. On the other side of the ball I have yet to find any solid data that Toledo sends anyone else out on defense other than Barry Church.
Here’s the x-factor, historically Toledo has owned NIU. That’s why the line is at 7. Up until last year NIU couldn’t win against Toledo if they had the Dallas Cowboys offensive line…well I don’t think any team could. Toledo has had NIU’s number. The problem? Toledo has a new coach. NIU has very young starters who don’t really know too much of the Toledo dominance over NIU. Heck even the NIU seniors are playing this game to even up the series with Toledo over their career. In fact from 2005 – 2008 the series is tied at 2-2 this would be the rubber match. I do believe that historical dominance is not something you can ignore, but I do feel that if you break down the numbers and recent history is against the trend then don’t buy into the trend. Take NIU, and then go out and buy drinks for the whole bar with your winnings.
Tags: Ball State, Bets, Bowling Green, CMU, Lines, MONEY Line, NCAA, NIU, PICKS, Spreads, Strategy, Toledo, Week 7, WMU
Posted in Week 7 | Comments (0)
I finished the week 2-2, not quite what I was hoping for. UNC beat Miami and ND beat Purdue, two terrible picks on my part. I should have seen the fact that Purdue’s starting QB is kind of junky, and that UNC would have a backup to the backup come in and win the game (Sexon). A great game on that kids part and I think UNC found their fill in QB until the starter is back.
NIU simply destroyed EMU and Michigan State romped Indiana. I think based on those two games I’m going to have to keep an eye on those teams in the weeks coming up. NIU is 4-0 ATS this season, so they are a team that you should have on your betting short list (and with a game this week vs. Tennessee the line should be pretty huge and worth keeping at least an eye on).
On a related note I’m glad I took my own advice and cut all bets that I would have made in half, it was just one of those weeks where nothing felt like a solid choice. Heck, take a look at all of the upsets within the Top 25 and I think even the “experts” on ESPN would agree with me.
How did the Machine do? 1 – 3, not so great for my computer friend? To be fair the Machine liked Sexon for UNC though, I ran the simulation with Sexon at QB and it had UNC on top big. Weird how the Machine knew that, but he has to bet on the same information that we as normal humans have.
Anywhoo, the 2-2 mark sucked, but it could have been much worse…I’m racking my brain trying to think of what chick a 2-2 would be like but I have to admit I’m having some serious trouble. I mean, a 2-2 is a SLIGHT loss of cash, and it’s ALMOST like breaking even, but it’s still a loss. Although to be fair, the loss is like payment for the thrill of being able to play the betting game, so if I had to choose 1 person I’d say a 2-2 mark is like Kristen Dunst. In the right light it looks like it could be a good thing, and it sure beats a whole lot of alternatives, but it’s not something you want to make a habit of doing or you could end up broke or with a disease.

Kirsten Dunst, like a 2-2 record, is ok to do once in awhile, but you don't want to make a habit of it.
Tags: FOOTBALL, MONEY Line, NCAA, PICKS, Recap, Spread, Week 5
Posted in Week 5 | Comments (1)